Top 3 reasons why the environmental agenda is a hoax
Recently, we’ve published several articles on the importance of environmentalism and being eco-conscious. However, here at resonance news, as Independent thinkers, we have to tell the facts. In our divided society, the media and politicians don’t want us to chew gum and walk at the same time. The more we live in a world of extreme polarities, the more control they have over us. It is not only possible but accurate to say that the environmental agenda is a hoax, while at the same time advocating for a more eco-spiritual system. As with most divisive topics, the devil is in the details as we will see. Are you resonating at a high frequency to have your views and opinions challenged? If so continue reading on.
Our review of the great reset book told us that we should trust our government in regards to quarantine. Furthermore, it discussed the great reset of capitalism and advocated for contact tracing to track those with and without covid. As with most leftist views, it sounds appealing on the surface but often comes with long unforeseen consequences. The reality of the great reset and the environmental agenda is that both pushing toward a type one civilization. If you’re not familiar with what that is, I recommend reading our article and discussing it here. In a nutshell, type one civilizations have exploited all natural resources within the planet and can control and manipulate the weather. If the masses are bombarded with fear-based global warming news, then they will welcome our government manipulating the weather.
As we continue to rely on technology to solve our problems after and during covid and integrate the internet to solve our problems for us, we are being driven away from nature. The more time with technology we spend, the less we’re spending in the present moment with nature. Therefore why should we care if the weather is manipulated for us? We’re not even enjoying the present moment of it, to begin with. It’s not so much nature vs nurture but technology vs nature and nature. In order for the masses to comply with totalitarian control, they have to be ok with it and driven away from nature.
keeping the masses addicted, obsessed, and reliant on social media and technology will make the transition to a type one civilization smoother. We don’t want to let nature run its course, nature will cease to become natural. A.I. will be the new god and the new natural. Beating death with synthetic hearts from A.I. will become the new natural. Vanity has no limit. While there are more, below are 3 reasons why the environmental agenda is a hoax.
#1-The sun, not Co2 is to blame for global warming.
Last year a peer-reviewed study found that the sun and not human emissions are responsible for global warming. The study contradicted several U.N. studies that blame humans for emitting co2 into the atmosphere. It is very important to know that most studies challenging global warming aren’t government-funded. As this slows the new world agenda for climate change acceptance to transition into one world order and type one civilization. Is it a coincidence that the same countries refuse the g7 climate meetings every year? Russia, China, and Trump? The countries are often portrayed as bad and resistant to NATO new world order. There is no greater red flag for a free-thinker than if a politician or country wants you to hate another dictator or country. With so much information out there it’s amazing how narratives are more influential than the truth.
More importantly, we see that accurate measurement of the sun is tampered with and often left out. This keeps the focus on co2 emissions and blames humans for global warming which furthers the new world order NATO agenda.
#2 The climate is always changing/Earth was warmer thousands of years ago
In 1895, a New York Times article claimed, “Geologists Think the World May Be Frozen Up Again” and foresaw “perennial frost and snow.” By 1932, the Times warned “Melting Polar Ice Caps to Raise the Level of Seas and Flood the Continent.” A 1958 Harper’s article predicted “The Coming Ice Age.”
Dr. Steven Allen
From the year 1000 to 1500, what scientists dubbed the medieval warm period, temperatures were way hotter than they are today. Shortly after the medieval warm period was the small ice age and now we’re transitioning back to the warm period. Life and nature aren’t a constant straight line but a cycle of patterns. The medieval warm period was 500 years prior to any industrialization. If that isn’t enough then consider this. A three thousand-year period known as the Holocene maximum, temperatures peaked higher than in the medieval period for 3 millenniums.
Unfortunately last year, the Holocene maximum was revised by Rutgers university. The study stated that the Holocene maximum was colder than previously reported, making the present day the period warmer than the Holocene maximum. Scientists fear speaking out as they will lose funding and grant money for future studies. Follow the money, what do the government and corporations lose? If people aren’t fearful of the global warming narrative renewable energy isn’t accepted. A.I. isn’t as marketed as a solution for our problems either. We don’t advance to type one civilization with believing in global warming. Furthermore, global warming pushes capitalism as an evil ideology as well. Ask yourself, what creates a more controlled order, a free market system, or a socialist system that shares everything?. The environmental agenda narrative gets you to hate capitalism for messing up the environment, which makes you more likely to accept other narratives that speak against capitalism whether it’s rooted in truth or not.
“Attempts to prevent global climate change from occurring are ultimately futile, and constitute a tragic misallocation of resources that would be better spent on humanity’s real and pressing problems.”
Scientist letter to the U.N.
Over 100 Prominent Scientists Warn UN Against ‘Futile’ Climate Control Efforts
#3 The politicization and Africa
Africa is and will be the breeding ground for future renewable energy. Politicians are advocating that as Africa becomes modernized it relies mostly on renewable energy. Africa’s population is going to double and needs the power to support this growing population. Africa is rich in gas and oil resources but is being pressured by climate change politicians to embrace renewable energy. In Africa today 600 million do not have electricity while 900 million lack access to clean cooking. This has severed pampered the continent’s ability to “develop”. A million children a year die from indoor smoke from wood-burning, due to lack of access to electric or gas stoves. renewable energy sources aren’t even powerful enough to power modernized cities, therefore how can we expect them to power growing populations such as Africa’s? If Africans wanted to use fossil fuels as the main supply, the continent would
While a solar panel can provide energy for a light bulb and a charge for a cell phone, it does little to help run stoves to avoid indoor air pollution or fridges to keep vaccines and food fresh, much less power agriculture and industry
Why Africa Needs Fossil Fuels
“WE NEED TO take a collective deep breath and understand what climate change is and isn’t. It is not like a huge asteroid hurtling toward earth, where we need to stop everything else and mobilize the entire global economy to ward off the end of the world. It is instead a long-term chronic condition like diabetes—a problem that needs attention and focus, but one that we can live with. And while we manage it, we can live our lives and address the many other challenges that ultimately will matter much more for the future.”
― Bjørn Lomborg
In conclusion, virtue-signaling climate change serves the agenda of corporations and government. The environmental agenda is a hoax because it tugs on the fear of the people. Fear causes us to lose all logic and reason. For instance, the majority of environmentalists speak against capitalism, yet the capitalist billionaires are the same ones that want the world to go green. While we must remain conscious of how we affect the earth, we must also be aware of hidden agendas via government politicians. From inaccurate measurement tools, biased funding, controlling media narratives, and silencing opposing views from climate deniers just to name a few.
Do you agree with our reasons against climate change? Let us know in the comment section below.